nit? tit? a hit!-

i didn't know there were any rules? what did i miss? as far as nits are concerned, i want my stuff nitted unmercifully - otherwise, i'll wander along in ignorant bliss. ok, to try to explain the focus: if the 'pellet' directly behind the bird is in focus, then a corresponding distance to the right should be, too. maybe it is and just doesn't appear to be. i like the way the lines play against each other and find it a very interesting composition - maybe so interesting that it takes some attention away from the bird.

No rules on having to nit - if this was a nit for the sake of nitting then discouragement would set in. If you like a shot then thats perfectly fine to say - Wow I like this.

I'm leaning here towards getting rid of the burgundy line, but as it is its perfectly fine as well.

I like Don's Title.

No backisies, and besides I like Don's idea.
:)

To Nit then..I would probably crop to get rid of the what ever it is on the right and just have loan birdie , what he is standing on and what ever it is behind him..Simple get rid of the reddish thing:-)
Don says don't touch a thing and title it
On Small Step for Man, One Giant Leap for Titmouse. Hey I have a built in critic:-)

I don't know what you mean by suspicious?

if you don't nit, how do we improve?? there something suspicious about the oof area to me, but not sure how to describe it without going into quantumm mechanix. cute shot, anyway...

You know I could ,if I wanted, probably find something to nits about, but this shot is so darn charming I don't want to.